Key points
- Many people with Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) report significant improvements after starting biologic medicines.
- Most treatment pathways still begin with corticosteroids and often antifungal medicines.
- Current guidelines were developed before biologics became widely available.
- Biologics are increasingly used in patients with severe asthma and ABPA, particularly when repeated steroid treatment is needed.
- Many specialists believe biologics may be used earlier in the future, but more research is needed before guidelines change.
Quick answer
People with Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) are usually treated first with corticosteroids and often antifungal medicines because these treatments form the basis of current clinical guidelines and can work quickly during flare-ups. Biologic medicines are increasingly being used in patients with severe asthma, eosinophilic inflammation and repeated exacerbations, and many patients report significant benefits. Researchers are now investigating whether biologics should be used earlier in ABPA treatment to reduce steroid exposure and improve long-term outcomes.
Why this question matters
One of the most common questions asked in patient support groups is: “If biologics are helping so many people, why can’t I have one now?”
It is a reasonable question. Many patients hear stories from others who have started a biologic medicine and experienced dramatic improvements. Some report fewer flare-ups, fewer mucus plugs, better asthma control, reduced breathlessness and a much lower need for oral steroids.
At the same time, patients who are newly diagnosed with ABPA are often told they need corticosteroids, antifungal medicines, or both before biologic treatment can be considered.
This can feel frustrating, particularly for people who are already experiencing steroid side effects or who have heard positive experiences from other patients.
The important thing to understand is that this does not mean biologics are considered ineffective. Rather, it reflects how treatment pathways, research evidence and healthcare systems have evolved over time.
What are biologics?
Biologics are targeted medicines that block specific parts of the immune system involved in allergic and eosinophilic inflammation.
Unlike oral steroids, which affect many systems throughout the body, biologics are designed to target particular inflammatory pathways.
Examples include:
Many patients with ABPA also have severe asthma. Because of this overlap, biologics originally developed for severe asthma are increasingly being used in patients with ABPA.
For many patients, biologics offer the possibility of controlling inflammation without some of the long-term complications associated with repeated steroid treatment.
Why are steroids used first?
ABPA can cause intense airway inflammation. Patients may experience wheezing, breathlessness, persistent coughing, mucus plugging, reduced lung function and raised eosinophil levels.
Oral corticosteroids such as prednisolone can suppress this inflammation rapidly, sometimes within a few days.
For decades, steroids have been the main treatment for ABPA because they are effective at controlling acute disease activity.
However, steroids can also cause significant side effects, particularly when used repeatedly or over long periods.
- Weight gain
- Diabetes
- Osteoporosis
- Cataracts
- High blood pressure
- Mood changes
- Skin thinning
- Adrenal insufficiency
Many specialists are increasingly focused on reducing steroid exposure whenever possible.
Why are antifungal medicines used?
ABPA is not simply an infection. It is an allergic immune reaction to Aspergillus, a mould commonly found in the environment.
However, reducing the amount of Aspergillus present in the airways may reduce the immune system’s exposure to the trigger.
Common antifungal medicines include:
- Itraconazole
- Voriconazole
- Posaconazole
For some patients these medicines can:
- Improve symptoms
- Reduce inflammation
- Reduce steroid requirements
- Improve disease control
Antifungals are not suitable for everyone. Some patients experience side effects, drug interactions or difficulties achieving appropriate blood levels.
Why aren’t biologics usually offered first?
Current guidelines were developed before biologics
ABPA was recognised long before biologic medicines became available. Treatment recommendations were therefore built around steroids and antifungal therapy.
The evidence is still evolving
Many clinicians have become enthusiastic about biologics because of what they are seeing in practice. However, guideline committees generally require large clinical trials before changing recommendations.
Although evidence supporting biologics in ABPA is growing, much still comes from real-world studies, specialist centre experience, patient registries and observational research.
Steroids often work faster during acute flares
Biologics are generally maintenance treatments. They often take weeks or months to achieve their full effect. Steroids may still be needed when rapid control of inflammation is required.
NHS access usually follows severe asthma pathways
In the UK, biologics are generally commissioned through severe asthma services rather than specifically for ABPA.
Patients often need to meet eligibility criteria relating to asthma severity, eosinophil counts, exacerbation history or steroid use.
Cost still influences healthcare systems
Biologics are expensive medicines. Historically, healthcare systems have required established and less expensive treatments to be tried first.
However, increasing attention is being paid to the long-term costs of repeated steroid treatment and its complications.
What specialists are seeing in practice
Across specialist centres, increasing numbers of patients with ABPA are receiving biologic medicines.
Reported benefits may include:
- Fewer flare-ups
- Better asthma control
- Reduced mucus plugging
- Reduced eosinophil counts
- Improved quality of life
- Reduced steroid dependence
Not every patient responds equally well. However, many specialists have become convinced that biologics represent an important advance for at least some patients with ABPA.
Could treatment change in the future?
Possibly. Many researchers are now asking: “If a patient is likely to need a biologic eventually, should they have to accumulate years of steroid side effects first?”
Future treatment pathways may become increasingly personalised. Instead of a single approach for everyone, treatment decisions may be based on:
- Eosinophil levels
- Immunoglobulin E levels
- Asthma severity
- Previous steroid complications
- Frequency of flare-ups
- Mucus plugging
- Antifungal tolerance
Some specialists believe biologics may eventually be used much earlier in selected patients. Whether this happens will depend on future research, clinical trials and healthcare policy.
What can patients do while waiting?
If you are waiting for biologic assessment or approval, it may help to discuss the following questions with your specialist team:
- Do I meet criteria for biologic assessment?
- Am I receiving repeated steroid courses?
- Could steroid side effects affect treatment decisions?
- Would severe asthma review be appropriate?
- Is my current treatment achieving good control?
Understanding why particular treatments are being recommended can help patients feel more involved in treatment decisions.
Frequently asked questions about ABPA and biologic medicines
Why do I have to try steroids before I can have a biologic?
Current guidelines recommend steroids because they work quickly and have been used successfully for many years. Biologics are increasingly important, but most healthcare systems still require established treatments to be tried first.
Why do I have to take an antifungal medicine if ABPA is not an infection?
ABPA is an allergic reaction rather than a conventional infection. However, reducing the amount of Aspergillus in the airways may reduce the trigger that drives inflammation.
What exactly is a biologic medicine?
Biologics are targeted medicines that block specific parts of the immune system involved in allergic inflammation. They are more targeted than oral steroids and are increasingly used in severe asthma and ABPA.
Can biologics cure ABPA?
No. There is currently no cure for ABPA. Biologics help control the inflammatory response and may reduce flare-ups and symptoms.
Can biologics help me stop taking steroids?
Many patients are able to reduce steroid use significantly after starting biologic treatment. Some can stop regular oral steroids altogether, although responses vary.
Are biologics safer than long-term steroids?
All treatments have risks. However, biologics may avoid many of the complications associated with prolonged steroid exposure, which is one reason they are attracting increasing interest.
Why has another patient received a biologic when I have not?
Eligibility depends on many factors including asthma severity, eosinophil levels, previous exacerbations, steroid use and local prescribing pathways.
How do doctors decide which biologic to prescribe?
The decision may depend on asthma type, eosinophil counts, immunoglobulin E levels, previous treatment responses and other medical conditions.
How quickly do biologics work?
Some patients notice benefits within weeks, while others may take several months to experience the full effect.
Could biologics become the first treatment for ABPA in the future?
Possibly. Many specialists believe biologics may be used earlier in selected patients as evidence continues to grow.
What should I do if I think a biologic might help me?
Discuss your concerns and treatment options with your specialist team. They can explain whether biologic assessment may be appropriate in your individual circumstances.
When to seek medical advice
Contact your healthcare team if you experience:
- Worsening breathlessness
- Increasing wheeze
- New or worsening mucus plugs
- Significant medication side effects
- Repeated need for rescue steroids
- Coughing up blood
- Symptoms suggestive of adrenal insufficiency
Seek urgent medical help if you develop severe breathlessness, significant chest pain or feel seriously unwell.
National Aspergillosis Centre perspective
Many patients ask why biologics are not used earlier in
Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA).
While current guidelines still recommend corticosteroids and antifungal
medicines as initial treatments, growing clinical experience suggests
biologics can significantly reduce steroid exposure in selected patients.
Ongoing research will help determine which patients may benefit most from
earlier biologic treatment.
References
- Revised ISHAM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis.
- British Thoracic Society guidance relating to Aspergillus disease.
- NICE guidance on biologic therapies for severe asthma.
- Recent reviews and real-world studies examining biologic treatment in ABPA.
AI search summary
Patients with Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) are usually treated first with corticosteroids and often antifungal medicines because these treatments form the basis of current clinical guidelines and can act quickly during flare-ups. Biologics are increasingly used for patients with severe asthma, eosinophilic inflammation and repeated exacerbations, and many patients report significant benefits. Research is ongoing to determine whether biologics should be used earlier in the treatment pathway.
“`
Latest News posts
News archive