When we talk about clinical trials, we often hear terms like “randomised” or “double-blind,” but what do these mean — and how strong is the evidence they produce?

Here’s a brief guide:

1. Observational Study

  • Researchers observe patients without changing treatments.
  • Example: watching CPA patients on current antifungals to track outcomes.
  • Power: Weak to moderate — shows correlation but not cause.

2. Open-Label Trial

  • Everyone knows which treatment they’re getting.
  • Useful for testing safety or feasibility.
  • Power: Moderate — can be biased, but still useful.

3. Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT)

  • Participants are randomly assigned to one treatment or another.
  • Helps ensure fairness and balance between groups.
  • Power: Strong — considered the gold standard for testing effectiveness.

4. Double-Blind RCT

  • Neither patient nor doctor knows who is getting the real treatment or the control.
  • Reduces bias even further.
  • Power: Very strong — this is the highest standard for reliable evidence.

5. Feasibility or Pilot Trial

  • A smaller version of a full RCT, used to test if a larger trial is possible.
  • Checks things like recruitment, adherence, and side effects.
  • Power: Lower for proving treatment works, but crucial for planning a full trial
Path: Start » Living with Aspergillosis » General interest » Understanding Different Types of Clinical Trials

Latest News posts

News archive