When we talk about clinical trials, we often hear terms like “randomised” or “double-blind,” but what do these mean — and how strong is the evidence they produce?
Here’s a brief guide:
1. Observational Study
- Researchers observe patients without changing treatments.
- Example: watching CPA patients on current antifungals to track outcomes.
- Power: Weak to moderate — shows correlation but not cause.
2. Open-Label Trial
- Everyone knows which treatment they’re getting.
- Useful for testing safety or feasibility.
- Power: Moderate — can be biased, but still useful.
3. Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Participants are randomly assigned to one treatment or another.
- Helps ensure fairness and balance between groups.
- Power: Strong — considered the gold standard for testing effectiveness.
4. Double-Blind RCT
- Neither patient nor doctor knows who is getting the real treatment or the control.
- Reduces bias even further.
- Power: Very strong — this is the highest standard for reliable evidence.
5. Feasibility or Pilot Trial
- A smaller version of a full RCT, used to test if a larger trial is possible.
- Checks things like recruitment, adherence, and side effects.
- Power: Lower for proving treatment works, but crucial for planning a full trial
Share this post
Path:
Start » Living with Aspergillosis » General interest » Understanding Different Types of Clinical Trials
Did this page help you?
Tell us in one minuteRelated information
When you struggle to hear or understand your doctor
November 12, 2026
What’s Up Docs? — health conversations worth listening to
November 12, 2026





