Genes and aspergillosis: why the same fungus causes different problems in different people

Why look at genes when talking about aspergillosis?

The theme of World Aspergillus Day 2026 was “How can the genomics revolution help patients with chronic aspergillosis?”
To answer that, we need to look briefly at genes and what they tell us about how the body resists infection.

Genes are the body’s instruction manual. They help control how our immune system works, how inflammation is managed, and how well we clear infections. Humans have around 25,000 genes, with two copies of each in almost every cell — and billions of cells using these instructions every day.

Small, natural differences in genes help explain why people respond differently to Aspergillus: some develop allergy, others chronic infection, and many clear it without any illness at all. Genes don’t determine outcomes, but they help us understand why the immune response differs between people.

Many people ask an understandable question:

“If we all breathe in Aspergillus spores, why do only some people get aspergillosis – and why does it look so different from person to person?”

Part of the answer lies in genes.

Genes do not cause aspergillosis on their own, but they can influence how the immune system responds once the fungus is encountered.


A simple way to think about genes

Genes act like settings, not switches.

They can influence:

  • how strongly your immune system reacts

  • whether that reaction is allergic, chronic, or weak

  • how well fungi are cleared from the lungs

Genes do not override:

  • lung damage (asthma, bronchiectasis, old infections)

  • steroid or immunosuppressive treatment

  • mould exposure levels

They help explain patterns of illness, not certainty.


Risk stacking: why combinations matter more than any single factor

Aspergillosis rarely develops because of one single cause. Instead, it usually arises through risk stacking, where several small risk factors overlap at the same time.

Each factor may add only a little vulnerability on its own, but together they can tip the balance from resistance to disease.

This helps explain why aspergillosis often appears after years of stability, or during periods of change such as illness, medication adjustment, or increased environmental exposure.

What does risk stacking look like in practice?

A person might have:

  • mild genetic tendencies toward allergic inflammation or reduced fungal clearance

  • asthma, bronchiectasis, or old lung damage

  • long-term inhaled or oral corticosteroid treatment

  • periods of higher mould exposure (for example, damp housing or renovation work)

None of these alone guarantees illness.

But stacked together, they increase the chance that Aspergillus:

  • is recognised as an allergen rather than ignored

  • is not cleared efficiently from the lungs

  • triggers ongoing inflammation or chronic infection

Where genes fit into risk stacking

Genes usually act as background modifiers, not primary causes.

In people with healthy lungs and normal immunity, genetic differences rarely matter.

In people who already have lung disease, immune suppression, or repeated exposure, those same genetic differences can add to the overall risk stack.

This also explains why there is no single genetic test that can predict aspergillosis — risk depends on combinations, not on one gene.

Just as risks can add up, risk reduction also adds up. Improvements in airway clearance, asthma control, steroid management, and home environment can all meaningfully reduce overall risk.


Why this matters in aspergillosis

Aspergillosis is not one condition. It includes:

  • fungal sensitisation and allergy

  • chronic pulmonary infection

  • invasive disease in people with weakened immunity

Different genes influence different stages of the immune response, which helps explain why people experience very different forms of disease.


1. Genes linked to fungal allergy and sensitisation

These genes affect whether the immune system treats Aspergillus as a strong allergen.

IL-4, IL-13 and the IL-4 receptor

What they do
Control allergic inflammation, including:

  • immunoglobulin E (IgE)

  • eosinophils

  • mucus production

  • airway inflammation

What this means
Certain natural gene variants increase the likelihood of:

  • fungal sensitisation

  • asthma with fungal sensitisation

  • allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA)

This fits closely with what patients experience clinically: high IgE, eosinophilia, steroid responsiveness, and response to biologic treatments.


HLA-DR and HLA-DQ

What they do
Help the immune system decide which proteins deserve attention.

What this means
Some HLA types present Aspergillus proteins in a way that:

  • encourages persistent allergic inflammation

  • increases the chance of ABPA

This helps explain why only a minority of people with asthma develop ABPA.


ITGB3 (integrin beta-3)

What it does
Helps airway and immune cells:

  • attach to surrounding tissue

  • communicate danger signals

  • interact with fungal-recognition pathways

What this means
Certain versions are linked to:

  • mould sensitisation

  • stronger immune signalling when fungal particles are present

This does not mean ITGB3 causes aspergillosis.
It helps explain why some people become sensitised more easily.


TLR2

What it does
Recognises fungal cell-wall components and triggers early immune responses.

What this means
Different versions can amplify or dampen inflammation, influencing sensitivity to fungi.


2. Genes linked to chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA)

These genes influence how well fungi are cleared, especially in damaged lungs.

MBL2 (mannose-binding lectin)

What it does
Marks fungi so the immune system can remove them.

What this means
Low MBL activity may allow Aspergillus to persist once lung cavities or scarring exist.


Dectin-1 (CLEC7A)

What it does
Detects fungal cell-wall sugars and triggers antifungal responses.

What this means
Reduced detection can allow slow, long-term infection rather than allergy.


TLR4

What it does
Regulates inflammation in response to microbes.

What this means
Certain variants may influence how chronic inflammation and tissue damage evolve.


3. Genes linked to invasive aspergillosis

These matter most in people with weakened immune systems (for example, during chemotherapy or after transplant).

PTX3 (pentraxin-3)

What it does
Acts as an early fungal sensor and helps immune cells kill Aspergillus.

What this means
Reduced PTX3 activity is one of the strongest known genetic risk factors for invasive aspergillosis in high-risk medical settings.


TLR3 and interferon pathways (including CXCL10)

What they do
Coordinate immune communication and antifungal killing.

What this means
Impairment can delay fungal control and increase the risk of spread.


How do scientists know these genes are involved?

Researchers study natural genetic variations that:

  • are common in healthy people

  • are present from birth

  • usually cause small functional differences, not disease by themselves

They:

  • compare people with aspergillosis to similar people without it

  • identify gene variants linked to specific disease patterns

  • test how those genes affect fungal recognition, inflammation, or killing

  • confirm findings in laboratory and clinical studies

These are risk modifiers, not disease-causing genes.


Does this mean my family is at risk?

This is a very common concern. The reassuring answer for most people is:

No – aspergillosis does not usually run in families.

Why this is reassuring

  • These gene variants are common in the general population

  • Most people who carry them never develop aspergillosis

  • Aspergillosis requires other factors, such as lung disease, immune suppression, or heavy exposure

  • There is no consistent pattern of aspergillosis being passed from parent to child

Even strong genetic signals (such as PTX3) only increase risk in specific high-risk medical situations, not in healthy relatives.


Putting it all together

Pattern of disease Genes most often involved
Fungal sensitisation IL-4, IL-13, IL-4 receptor, ITGB3, TLR2
ABPA IL-4/IL-13 pathway, HLA-DR/DQ, TLR3
Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis MBL2, Dectin-1, TLR4
Invasive aspergillosis PTX3, interferon pathways

What this means for patients and families

  • Genetic testing is not routinely needed

  • These genes do not predict individual outcomes

  • Family members are not usually at increased risk

The most important factors remain:

  • good lung care

  • appropriate treatment

  • sensible mould exposure reduction

Genes influence risk — they do not determine destiny.


Understanding Risk: How Common Is “Rare”?

When doctors talk about risk, it can sound worrying — especially when you’re already living with a lung condition.
But every day, we all take small, managed risks without realising it.

Understanding how everyday risks compare with medical or vaccine risks helps put the numbers into perspective — and shows why treatment is almost always worth it.


🚶‍♀️ Everyday activities carry small risks

Everyday life is full of tiny risks we accept because the benefits are clear — exercise, travel, independence, and social connection.

Activity Estimated risk of serious harm Equivalent comparison
Driving a car for 250 miles About 1 in 1 million chance of fatal accident Roughly the same as the risk of a severe vaccine reaction
Cycling for 30 minutes About 1 in 3 million Similar to being struck by lightning in your lifetime
Walking near traffic for a day Around 1 in 15 million Negligible, but not zero
Taking a domestic flight (UK) Less than 1 in 10 million chance of fatal accident Far safer than most road journeys
Catching flu during winter Around 1 in 10 chance of getting ill Much higher risk than most medicine side effects

We don’t think of these activities as “dangerous” because the benefit far outweighs the risk — just as it does with most treatments.


💊 Medicines and vaccines we take safely every day

Most common medicines have mild, short-lived side effects. Serious reactions are possible but extremely rare.

Medicine Typical mild effects Serious reactions (approx. frequency) Comment
Paracetamol (acetaminophen) Nausea, rash Serious liver injury ≈ 1 in 100,000 (usually after overdose) Very safe when taken correctly
Ibuprofen Heartburn, upset stomach Ulcer or stomach bleed ≈ 1 in 1,000 if used long term Safer when taken with food
Amoxicillin Diarrhoea, mild rash Severe allergic reaction ≈ 1 in 5,000–10,000 Rare but recognised
Influenza vaccine Sore arm, tiredness Severe allergic reaction ≈ 1 in 1 million Prevents thousands of serious infections yearly
COVID-19 vaccine Mild flu-like symptoms (≈ 1 in 10) Severe allergic reaction ≈ 1 in 100,000 Benefits far outweigh risks
Oral steroids (short course) Increased appetite, insomnia Major side effects only with prolonged use Vital during ABPA or asthma flares

⚕️ What does “serious side effect” really mean?

When you read about serious reactions in medical leaflets or vaccine information, it doesn’t necessarily mean life-changing.
The term “serious” has a specific medical meaning, used by the MHRA, EMA, and WHO.

A reaction is called serious if it:

  • leads to hospitalisation,

  • is life-threatening at the time,

  • causes temporary disability or incapacity,

  • results in death, or

  • causes a birth defect.

👉 It’s about medical urgency, not always long-term harm.

In reality, most serious reactions are short-lived and fully reversible with prompt treatment.
For example:

  • An anaphylactic reaction to a vaccine is medically serious because it needs immediate care — but nearly everyone recovers completely once treated.

  • A high fever or rash that requires a day in hospital may be serious in reporting terms, but causes no permanent damage.

By contrast, life-changing reactions (such as nerve injury or organ failure) are extraordinarily rare — far rarer than being struck by lightning.

“When doctors say ‘serious reaction’, they mean something that needs urgent medical attention — not something that will leave you permanently unwell.”


🩺 More common health risks we all face

While medicine risks are very small, the everyday risks to life and health are much higher — especially if conditions go untreated.

Health event or cause Approximate annual risk (UK adult) Lifetime risk Notes
Heart attack Around 1 in 200–300 per year 1 in 4 men, 1 in 6 women Increases with age, smoking, and high blood pressure
Stroke Around 1 in 250 per year About 1 in 5 adults Preventable with healthy lifestyle and medication
Cancer (any type) Around 1 in 125 per year Around 1 in 2 people in their lifetime Most treatable when found early
Serious road accident About 1 in 15,000 per year Around 1 in 100 lifetime Far higher than a vaccine reaction
Severe flu needing hospital care Around 1 in 500 per winter Higher for people with lung disease Preventable by flu vaccination
Fatal asthma attack About 1 in 100,000 per year Higher in uncontrolled asthma Preventable with good management
COVID-19 death (current UK levels) Around 1 in 2,000–5,000 per year for older/vulnerable adults Major reason vaccination still matters
Lightning strike About 1 in 15 million per year Around 1 in 300,000 lifetime Benchmark for “extremely rare” risk

⚖️ Making sense of the numbers

  • A 1 in 1,000 risk means one person in a large GP practice might experience it.

  • A 1 in 100,000 risk means one person in a football stadium crowd.

  • A 1 in 1 million risk is so rare that most doctors never see it in their career.

So when you hear that a serious vaccine reaction occurs in one in a million people, that’s about the same as:

  • being struck by lightning once in your life, or

  • winning a small lottery prize several times in a row.


❤️ The real takeaway

The greatest risks to life and health are the common diseases we can prevent or treat — not the rare side effects of treatment.

Every vaccine or medicine is carefully assessed so that its benefits far outweigh its risks, especially for people with asthma, ABPA, bronchiectasis, or weakened immunity.
Treatments don’t add danger — they reduce the much bigger risks from infection, inflammation, and lung damage.


🧭 Key message

We all live with risk, but:

  • Most everyday and health-related risks are far greater than the tiny chance of a medicine reaction.

  • Managing your lung condition well — with the right treatment, vaccines, and follow-up — protects your lungs and lengthens your life.

  • The safest path is always informed care, not avoidance through fear.